søndag 21. februar 2010

HOW FOOD SHAPES OUR CITIES AND LANDSCAPE

Every day, cities like London, Paris, Dubai, New York, Oslo or Bergen needs a large amount of food brought in to keep its inhabitants running. It is produced, transported, bought and sold, cooked, eaten and disposed of. This scenario has to happen in every city on earth, 365 days every year. In this process we change our surrounding (or some ones surrounding) landscape to large production fields. For growing grains f ex.
But as we move into cities, statistically we tend to eat more meat. And to produce meat, ten times as much grain is needed in the process to make enough for one person. Which again consumes an enormous amount of energy (oil) and produces waste and methane (green house gas) when produced.
















One person on a vegetable diet can manage with approx 1350m2 of land to get 3000 kcal a day through the year. On potato diet280m2.













On a meat diet (cow) one needs approx 8200m2 of land to produce enough for one year.
To calculate approximately how much land one person “consume” one can use calculations in DIY (do it yourself) spirit for example calculate the number of calories (food energy) we require, and compare that value to the calories available from various food crops and the amount of land they need. You could refine the calculation further accounting for sources of essential nutrients: protein, carbohydrates, fat, vitamins, minerals.
An interesting article on agricultural land use takes this approach. It’s assumed that humans need 3,000 calories per day, (of course this is varying according to what you do for a living or how much work out after work). That figure is applied to a study of agricultural land used for all the food eaten in the Netherlands. For example, potato is the most efficient crop, and according to the study requires 0.2 square meters to produce 1kg, which contains 800 calories. It would therefore take 274m2 to produce enough calories for one person for one year. That’s an area less than 10m x 30m (about 33 x 100 ft). To get 3000 calories from vegetables other than potatoes requires 1314m2, eggs 2395m2, and at the high end, beef 8173.
(tinyfarmwiki.com)

Aerial view over the football stadium and surrounding football fields on Minde.
One footballfield cover about the same area needed for production of enough cow meat to support one person with 3000kcal pr day through the year, mixed with vegs this area can support a family of four.
Pink square indicates one footballfield= one persons food footprint on cow diet one year
Green square= footprint of one person on potato diet.

The calculations in this post is meant as a visual illustration of the impact the industrialization of agricultural business has on our landscape, together with the size of transportation logistics; moving all the food around for processing and retail on a global scale.
To illustrate the size, impact and variety this has google maps is a great tool.
Under follows 4 aerials in same scale 1:5000;


Fertile agricultural lanscape outside Detroit, strict and regular squares of crops.


Same sized area of Dubai. Desert and unproductive land.


Aerial over Malmø/Skaane region, most productive agricultural land in Sweeden. With its
850 000 hectars productive land this landscape can support 3,5 mill people within a hundred mile diet, the way it is run today. On a vegetarian diet the same area can support 17 mill people.
(http://www.mosaic-region.no/Produserendelandskap.html)


Bergen/Hordaland region in same scale. Working with a hundred mile diet perspective here we definitely need to think differently. Food production in spaces in between...

fredag 19. februar 2010

Minister of Finance called for further development of economic instruments to protect nature

On the 15th of February the Ministry of Environment published this article on their web page:

"Sigbjørn Johnsen, Minister of Finance, held the closing address at the sixth Trondheim Conference on Biodiversity. The Conference was attended by more than 300 participants form almost 100 countries representing governments, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, and scientific and academic institutions.

Over the five-day meeting, participants discussed status and lessons learned from the current Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2010 target and setting post 2010 targets, including emerging issues and challenges for addressing drivers of biodiversity loss.

Johnson explained that in Norway, the finance ministry coordinates sustainable development work and that biodiversity is an important part of this strategy as biological diversity is required for meeting these goals and ensuring intergenerational equity. He highlighted the fair access and benefit sharing and the elimination of harmful subsidies. He called for further development of economic instruments to protect nature and stated that the value of economic of biodiversity is often underestimated or ignored."

You can read the whole speech from the seminar here.

It makes me exited that this now seems to be a growing issue in the Norwegian Government but also in the EU.

On the CITY AS BIOTOPE course last autumn I worked a lot around the issues regarding the economics of nature-service and biodiversity.


DISPOSING OF FUTURE RESOURCES

"Biodiversity matters for Ethical, Emotional, Environmental and Economics. Ecosystems have intrinsic value. They provide emotional and aesthetic experiences. They offer outstanding opportunities for recreation. They clean our water, purify our air and maintain our soils. They regulate the climate, recycle nutrients and provide us with food. They provide raw materials and resources for medicines and other purposes. They form the foundation on which we build our societies.
...Human well-being is dependent upon "ecosystem services" provided by nature for free, such as water and air purification, fisheries, timber and nutrient cycling. These are predominantly public goods with no markets and no prices, so their loss often is not detected by our current economic incentive system and can thus continue unabated. A variety of pressures resulting from population growth, changing diets, urbanisation, climate change and many other factors is causing biodiversity to decline, and ecosystems are continuously being degraded. The world’s poor are most at risk from the continuing loss of biodiversity, as they are the ones that are most reliant on the ecosystem services that are being degraded."
from the Biodivercity Policy of the European Commission

Biodiversity makes ecosystems//communeties//cities more flexible. So how will Bergen plan for the keeping and growth of the richness within our neighbourhoods? And what economic loss/gain is the potential for some sites historically and for the future? Planning and making smart choices for our selves and our descendants...

resource : water
green aeras // parks
preserved natural places
transitional spaces
undeveloped spaces

See here for my whole text on this topic.

Further interesting reading on the topic;

The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB)
by Pavan Sukhdev for the German Federal Ministry for the Environment and the European Commission

KLIMAKUR-BLOGG


Ministry of Environment sent out today Klimakur 2020 for public consultation. In addition, the Ministry has created a blog where everyone can participate.

http://klimakur.wordpress.com/

torsdag 18. februar 2010

CAMPAIGN ON BAD MANAGEMENT DANMARKSPLASS



Today BAF (Bergen Architecture Association) adressed their members with this campaign to sign.

"B E K Y M R I N G S M E L D I N G

Til Lisbeth Iversen
byråd for byutvikling, næring og klima.

Vi ønsker en fremtidsrettet byutvikling, som bidrar til å redusere miljøbelastningene for Bergen by. Undertegnede arkitekter er bekymret for utviklingen i Danmarksplassområdet på følgende tre områder:

M I L J Ø
Danmarksplass tåler ikke en byutvikling som bidrar til økt biltrafikk og mer luftforurensning. En forverring av luftkvaliteten er uakseptabelt. Vi ønsker heller ikke at bygningskorridoren langs motorveien skal forlenges slik at den visuelle kontakten med sjøen reduseres.

F O R V A L T I N G
Vi er bekymret for at planlagt utbygging ikke samsvarer med krav til ansvarlig forvalting av lovverket. Vi setter spørsmålstegn ved om det er forsvarlig og formålstjenlig for samfunnet at søknaden om å bygge ut 50 000 kvadratmeter med bank, hotell og messesenter behandles uten at det foretas en konsekvensutredning.

P O L I T I S K V I L J E
Vi er stolte over at Bergen kommune har etablert klimaforum, klimaplan og egen klimasjef. I tillegg har byrådet i Bergen uttrykt stor vilje til å gjennomføre tiltak for et klimanøytralt bysamfunn på flere viktige områder innen transport, kollektivtilbud og parkeringspolitikk.

Vi er bekymret for at planen for Danmarksplass/Solheimsviken ikke samsvarer med byrådets uttalte målsettinger for en fremtidsrettet byutvikling som bidrar til å redusere miljøbelastningene for byen!

Bergen Arkitektforening ved styret, februar 2010"


http://www.arkitektur.no/?nid=201293

The light rail-test drive 19th of January

Bergen Light Rail - testdrive January 19 - 2010 from Knut Georg Flo on Vimeo.

The light rail-first tour into the town centre

Bergen Light Rail II - February 17 - 2010 from Knut Georg Flo on Vimeo.

BYBANEN-foto blogg




Sunday last week me and my son was out walking in the city center of Bergen and suddenly we heard a familiar but unfamiliar sound; BYBANEN!
One of the new carriges was approaching us just outside the train station.
Very nice moment.
Soon (when the social anthropology essay is finished) it will be time to go into the light rail path and some of the situations around its stops. Cant wait!



For more pics see here: bybanen-fotoblogg

Fred Kent lecture-Project for Public Spaces



















Summer 2009 I was lucky to join NUDA´s summer school (www.nuda.no) in Bergen, and at this second NUDA Summer School the subject was Placemaking and Waterfront development. Fred Kent and Kathy Madden (PPS)took us through lectures, knowledge exchange, workshop and discussions. Russia, Romania, Australia, Sweden, Polen and Norway was represented, 35 people in total, that exchanged ideas and their views on public spaces and the Fishmarket, the site chosen for the workshop.




This lecture is from the University of California;

onsdag 17. februar 2010

Rob Hopkins-Resilience leader



http://transitionculture.org/

The Norwegian Ministry of the Environment presents the goals for 2020


Today the Climate and Pollution Agency presented the Governments plan of sustainable action for 2020 (Klimakur 2020).
Soon you can view the talk here:

http://presenter.qbrick.com/?pguid=9816df16-977e-41bb-b02c-cdbb3cff2b00

http://www.klimakur2020.no/

Andy Goldsworthy-Rivers and Tides

A G makes beautiful sculptures in nature that capture time, space and light in a way that totally moves me.. Search for more or get the movie Rivers and Tides.

Oil free life?

Try this at home! Soon our dependency would be much clearer to us I think...

tirsdag 16. februar 2010

A Farm for the Future

If you have the time and the energy this is a documentary full of information on food and the energy consumtion involved in industrialized agriculture.

fredag 12. februar 2010

Edward Burtynsky on manufactured landscapes

for best view see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2Dd4k63-zM&feature=related

or watch at TED:

what makes us change behavior when knowledge don`t?


It´s the sosial anthropology weeks of the diploma, and I find it difficult to narrow the subject and pinpoint a good and accurate issue for my essay.
What makes us change our rutines and behavior in everyday life when knowledge don´t?
We know it is smart to recycle our waste, but still quite many I know only have one dustbin under their kitchen sink. (When one could have one each for plastic, organic, paper, batteries, metal/glass, etc).
We know everybody driving to work alone in each car is very bad for air quality, we can even see the direct impact it has to our environment here in Bergen in wintertime, and still we do it.

P. Bourdieu describes people as results of their environment when they grew up, this environment decides how we look at our surroundings as adults. "What you learn without language (action) is hard to unlearn with language (theory)".

So, maybe a mix of good rolemodels and regulations is needed to change our habits and lower our lifes carbon footprint? How long is that going to take then? Or maybe we need to see a more accurate and direct result of our lifestyle in our closest environment, f ex having the wasteplant just around the corner from where we live? The Japanese architect Kisho Kurokawa puts it like this;

”Let´s take the example of mixing factories and housing which would normally be prohibited by functional town-planning theories. Ordinarily a factory should be located far away from housing, but I think that only by living with the factory can we control its pollution. If we needed a big atomic power station we should build one right in the center of Tokyo. There you can see it and feel its output and only then does it really come into people’s consciousness. Under these conditions we might be able to control what’s going on around us and take action concerning such things as power stations. This is the basic idea of symbiosis – the very antithesis of Functionalism.”

What Kurokawa is implying, relates to the theory of virtue ethics; we act according to how the world is presented to us.
(Mathias Kemton on Architecture as a philosophical contribution to sustainability)

As an architect and a planner I am thinking my contribution can be to design accessible environments for people to make it easier for people to live easier lifes. Good space to move in when going to school, work, gym, band practice, sunbathing, shopping, clubbing etc. Short way to the light rail, good bikelanes, accessible pedestrian paths etc. Making it more timeconsuming to use the car rather than going by bike, public transportation or walk.
Mixed neighbourhoods with workspace, shops, schools, kindergardens, parks and a large variety in appartment size and standard can be strategic solutions to attract people to live their everyday life locally, and to live there for a longer time, wich again can strenghten the neighbourhoods in a positive way. Maybe.

But first of all we need to get this essay ready. Focus.

Carolyn Steel: How food shapes our cities